Diaspora/Diaspora

 Keyboard shortcuts available

Want to see Diaspora in your language? Join the translation team and help with the translations!

help.sharing.only_sharing_a

Se tracta del personas qui te ha addite a un de lor aspectos, ma qui non es (ancora) in alcun de tu aspectos. In altere parolas, illes divide con te, ma tu non divide con illes: tu pote pensar de illes como "sequitores". Si tu les adde a un aspecto, illes apparera sub ille aspecto e non sub "Divide con me, ma non vice versa". Vide hic supra.
Se tracta del personas qui te ha addite a un de lor aspectos, ma qui non es (ancora) in alcun de tu aspectos. In altere parolas, illes divide con te, ma tu non divide con illes: tu pote pensar de illes como "sequitores". Si tu les adde a un aspecto, illes apparera sub ille aspecto e non sub "Divide con me, ma non vice versa". Vide hic supra.

These are people that have added you to one of their aspects, but who are not (yet) in any of your aspects. In other words, they are sharing with you, but you are not sharing with them: you can think of this as them “following” you. If you add them to an aspect, they will then appear under that aspect and not under “Only sharing with me”. See above.

History

These are people that have added you to one of their aspects, but who are not (yet) in any of your aspects. In other words, they are sharing with you, but you are not sharing with them (asymmetrical sharing). If you add them to an aspect, they will then appear under that aspect and not under "only sharing with you". See above.
These are people that have added you to one of their aspects, but who are not (yet) in any of your aspects. In other words, they are sharing with you, but you are not sharing with them (asymmetrical sharing). If you add them to an aspect, they will then appear under that aspect and not under "only sharing with you". See above.

No previous version to compare to.

changed via the API 26 August, 2013 14:05.
These are people that have added you to one of their aspects, but who are not (yet) in any of your aspects. In other words, they are sharing with you, but you are not sharing with them (asymmetrical sharing). If you add them to an aspect, they will then appear under that aspect and not under "only sharing with you". See above.
These are people that have added you to one of their aspects, but who are not (yet) in any of your aspects. In other words, they are sharing with you, but you are not sharing with them (asymmetrical sharing). If you add them to an aspect, they will then appear under that aspect and not under "only sharing with you". See above.

changed by Jonne Haß 26 August, 2013 14:25 via a Batch Operation.
Se tracta del personas qui te ha addite a un de lor aspectos, ma qui non es (ancora) in alcun de tu aspectos. In altere parolas, illes divide cosas con te, ma tu non divide alcun cosa con illes (diffusion asymmetric). Si tu les adde a un aspecto, illes apparera sub ille aspecto e non sub "divide solmente con me". Vide hic supra.
Se tracta del personas qui te ha addite a un de lor aspectos, ma qui non es (ancora) in alcun de tu aspectos. In altere parolas, illes divide cosas con te, ma tu non divide alcun cosa con illes (diffusion asymmetric). Si tu les adde a un aspecto, illes apparera sub ille aspecto e non sub "divide solmente con me". Vide hic supra.
Se tracta del personas qui te ha addite a un de lor aspectos, ma qui non es (ancora) in alcun de tu aspectos. In altere parolas, illes divide cosas con te, ma tu non divide alcun cosa con illes (diffusion asymmetric). Si tu les adde a un aspecto, illes apparera sub ille aspecto e non sub "divide solmente con me". Vide hic supra.

No previous version to compare to.

changed by Martijn Dekker 27 September, 2014 14:57.
These are people that have added you to one of their aspects, but who are not (yet) in any of your aspects. In other words, they are sharing with you, but you are not sharing with them (asymmetrical sharing). If you add them to an aspect, they will then appear under that aspect and not under “only sharing with you“. See above.
These are people that have added you to one of their aspects, but who are not (yet) in any of your aspects. In other words, they are sharing with you, but you are not sharing with them (asymmetrical sharing). If you add them to an aspect, they will then appear under that aspect and not under “only sharing with you“. See above.
- These are people that have added you to one of their aspects, but who are not (yet) in any of your aspects. In other words, they are sharing with you, but you are not sharing with them (asymmetrical sharing). If you add them to an aspect, they will then appear under that aspect and not under "only sharing with you". See above.
- These are people that have added you to one of their aspects, but who are not (yet) in any of your aspects. In other words, they are sharing with you, but you are not sharing with them (asymmetrical sharing). If you add them to an aspect, they will then appear under that aspect and not under “only sharing with you“. See above.
changed via the API 14 April, 2015 13:42.
Se tracta del personas qui te ha addite a un de lor aspectos, ma qui non es (ancora) in alcun de tu aspectos. In altere parolas, illes divide cosas con te, ma tu non divide alcun cosa con illes (diffusion asymmetric). Si tu les adde a un aspecto, illes apparera sub ille aspecto e non sub "divide solmente con me". Vide hic supra.
Se tracta del personas qui te ha addite a un de lor aspectos, ma qui non es (ancora) in alcun de tu aspectos. In altere parolas, illes divide cosas con te, ma tu non divide alcun cosa con illes (diffusion asymmetric). Si tu les adde a un aspecto, illes apparera sub ille aspecto e non sub "divide solmente con me". Vide hic supra.
Se tracta del personas qui te ha addite a un de lor aspectos, ma qui non es (ancora) in alcun de tu aspectos. In altere parolas, illes divide cosas con te, ma tu non divide alcun cosa con illes (diffusion asymmetric). Si tu les adde a un aspecto, illes apparera sub ille aspecto e non sub "divide solmente con me". Vide hic supra.

changed via the API 14 April, 2015 13:42.
These are people that have added you to one of their aspects, but who are not (yet) in any of your aspects. In other words, they are sharing with you, but you are not sharing with them: you can think of this as them “following” you. If you add them to an aspect, they will then appear under that aspect and not under “Only sharing with me”. See above.
These are people that have added you to one of their aspects, but who are not (yet) in any of your aspects. In other words, they are sharing with you, but you are not sharing with them: you can think of this as them “following” you. If you add them to an aspect, they will then appear under that aspect and not under “Only sharing with me”. See above.
- These are people that have added you to one of their aspects, but who are not (yet) in any of your aspects. In other words, they are sharing with you, but you are not sharing with them (asymmetrical sharing). If you add them to an aspect, they will then appear under that aspect and not under “only sharing with you“. See above.
- These are people that have added you to one of their aspects, but who are not (yet) in any of your aspects. In other words, they are sharing with you, but you are not sharing with them: you can think of this as them “following” you. If you add them to an aspect, they will then appear under that aspect and not under “Only sharing with me”. See above.
changed via the API 19 April, 2015 13:58.
These are people that have added you to one of their aspects, but who are not (yet) in any of your aspects. In other words, they are sharing with you, but you are not sharing with them: you can think of this as them “following” you. If you add them to an aspect, they will then appear under that aspect and not under “Only sharing with me”. See above.
These are people that have added you to one of their aspects, but who are not (yet) in any of your aspects. In other words, they are sharing with you, but you are not sharing with them: you can think of this as them “following” you. If you add them to an aspect, they will then appear under that aspect and not under “Only sharing with me”. See above.

changed by Jonne Haß 24 July, 2016 14:06 via a Batch Operation.
Se tracta del personas qui te ha addite a un de lor aspectos, ma qui non es (ancora) in alcun de tu aspectos. In altere parolas, illes divide con te, ma tu non divide con illes: tu pote pensar de illes como "sequitores". Si tu les adde a un aspecto, illes apparera sub ille aspecto e non sub "Divide con me, ma non vice versa". Vide hic supra.
Se tracta del personas qui te ha addite a un de lor aspectos, ma qui non es (ancora) in alcun de tu aspectos. In altere parolas, illes divide con te, ma tu non divide con illes: tu pote pensar de illes como "sequitores". Si tu les adde a un aspecto, illes apparera sub ille aspecto e non sub "Divide con me, ma non vice versa". Vide hic supra.
Se tracta del personas qui te ha addite a un de lor aspectos, ma qui non es (ancora) in alcun de tu aspectos. In altere parolas, illes divide con te, ma tu non divide con illes: tu pote pensar de illes como "sequitores". Si tu les adde a un aspecto, illes apparera sub ille aspecto e non sub "Divide con me, ma non vice versa". Vide hic supra.
- Se tracta del personas qui te ha addite a un de lor aspectos, ma qui non es (ancora) in alcun de tu aspectos. In altere parolas, illes divide cosas con te, ma tu non divide alcun cosa con illes (diffusion asymmetric). Si tu les adde a un aspecto, illes apparera sub ille aspecto e non sub "divide solmente con me". Vide hic supra.
- Se tracta del personas qui te ha addite a un de lor aspectos, ma qui non es (ancora) in alcun de tu aspectos. In altere parolas, illes divide con te, ma tu non divide con illes: tu pote pensar de illes como "sequitores". Si tu les adde a un aspecto, illes apparera sub ille aspecto e non sub "Divide con me, ma non vice versa". Vide hic supra.
changed by Martijn Dekker 16 June, 2017 16:24.
Se tracta del personas qui te ha addite a un de lor aspectos, ma qui non es (ancora) in alcun de tu aspectos. In altere parolas, illes divide con te, ma tu non divide con illes: tu pote pensar de illes como "sequitores". Si tu les adde a un aspecto, illes apparera sub ille aspecto e non sub "Divide con me, ma non vice versa". Vide hic supra.
Se tracta del personas qui te ha addite a un de lor aspectos, ma qui non es (ancora) in alcun de tu aspectos. In altere parolas, illes divide con te, ma tu non divide con illes: tu pote pensar de illes como "sequitores". Si tu les adde a un aspecto, illes apparera sub ille aspecto e non sub "Divide con me, ma non vice versa". Vide hic supra.
Se tracta del personas qui te ha addite a un de lor aspectos, ma qui non es (ancora) in alcun de tu aspectos. In altere parolas, illes divide con te, ma tu non divide con illes: tu pote pensar de illes como "sequitores". Si tu les adde a un aspecto, illes apparera sub ille aspecto e non sub "Divide con me, ma non vice versa". Vide hic supra.

changed by Martijn Dekker 16 June, 2017 16:28.