Diaspora/Website
-
Sa majoria de sas retzas sotziales funtzionant cun servers de propriedade de una corporatzione, e manigiados dae issos. Custos servers sarvant totu sos datos privados de sos impreadores. Custas informatziones podent èssere pèrdidas o furadas, e comente in totu sos sistemas cun unu tzugu de ampulla unuproblema in sos servers tzentrales diat pòdere rallentare totu sa retza, o la diat pòdere fintzas firmare de su totu. E est fintzas meda prus fàtzile "ascurtare" pro sos governos.
Sa majoria de sas retzas sotziales funtzionant cun servers de propriedade de una corporatzione, e manigiados dae issos. Custos servers sarvant totu sos datos privados de sos impreadores. Custas informatziones podent èssere pèrdidas o furadas, e comente in totu sos sistemas cun unu tzugu de ampulla unuproblema in sos servers tzentrales diat pòdere rallentare totu sa retza, o la diat pòdere fintzas firmare de su totu. E est fintzas meda prus fàtzile "ascurtare" pro sos governos.
Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to “listen in.”
History
-
Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to 'listen in'.Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to 'listen in'.
-
Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to 'listen in'.Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to 'listen in'.
-
Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to “listen in.”Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to “listen in.”
-
Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to “listen in.”Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to “listen in.”
-
Sa majoria de sas retzas sotziales funtzionant cun servers de propriedade de una corporatzione, e manigiados dae issos. Custos servers sarvant totu sos datos privados de sos impreadores. Custas informatziones podent èssere pèrdidas o furadas, e comente in totu sos sistemas cun unu tzugu de ampulla unuproblema in sos servers tzentrales diat pòdere rallentare totu sa retza, o la diat pòdere fintzas firmare de su totu. E est fintzas meda prus fàtzile "ascurtare" pro sos governos.Sa majoria de sas retzas sotziales funtzionant cun servers de propriedade de una corporatzione, e manigiados dae issos. Custos servers sarvant totu sos datos privados de sos impreadores. Custas informatziones podent èssere pèrdidas o furadas, e comente in totu sos sistemas cun unu tzugu de ampulla unuproblema in sos servers tzentrales diat pòdere rallentare totu sa retza, o la diat pòdere fintzas firmare de su totu. E est fintzas meda prus fàtzile "ascurtare" pro sos governos.
Sa majoria de sas retzas sotziales funtzionant cun servers de propriedade de una corporatzione, e manigiados dae issos. Custos servers sarvant totu sos datos privados de sos impreadores. Custas informatziones podent èssere pèrdidas o furadas, e comente in totu sos sistemas cun unu tzugu de ampulla unuproblema in sos servers tzentrales diat pòdere rallentare totu sa retza, o la diat pòdere fintzas firmare de su totu. E est fintzas meda prus fàtzile "ascurtare" pro sos governos.