🔁

Discussion commencée , avec un commentaire.
  1. Bigosya Traducteur en arménien (est) ayant un droit de relecture total (incluant ses propres traductions)

    I have a question here. is it the users that "already interacted with the post" (here I understand that as commented/liked/reshared it) or the users whom the post is available(they have access to it)?

  2. The former, since the latter would be an information leak that's bad for the author (all members of it can figure out what the author considers one peer group/aspect) and for the other recipients (all recipients can start mapping FOAF graphs).


Historique

  1. No, not currently.
    No, not currently.

    No, not currently.

    modifié via l’API .
    Copier dans le presse-papier
  2. No, not currently.
    No, not currently.

    No, not currently.

    modifié par Jonne Haß via une opération en batch.
    Copier dans le presse-papier
  3. Non pas, pel moment.
    Non pas, pel moment.
    modifié par Quentin .
    Copier dans le presse-papier
  4. Non pas, pel moment.
    Non pas, pel moment.
    modifié par Quentin .
    Copier dans le presse-papier
  5. Since version 0.7.0.0, yes! You can mention someone in a comment the same way you would do it in a post, by typing “@” and then start typing their name. Please note that when you comment on a post which is not public, you can only mention users who have already interacted with the post.
    Since version 0.7.0.0, yes! You can mention someone in a comment the same way you would do it in a post, by typing “@” and then start typing their name. Please note that when you comment on a post which is not public, you can only mention users who have already interacted with the post.

    Since version 0.7.0.0, yes! You can mention someone in a comment the same way you would do it in a post, by typing “@” and then start typing their name. Please note that when you comment on a post which is not public, you can only mention users who have already interacted with the post.

    modifié via l’API .
    Copier dans le presse-papier
  6. Non pas, pel moment.
    Non pas, pel moment.
    modifié via l’API .
    Copier dans le presse-papier
  7.  
    modifié par Benjamin Neff via une opération en batch.
    Copier dans le presse-papier
  8. Dempuèi la version 0.7.0.0 podètz ! Podètz mencionar qualqu’un dins un comentari del meteis biais qu’o fasètz dins una publicacion, n’utilizar “@” e començatz a picar lor nom. Notatz que per las publicacions pas publicas, podètz pas que mencionar qualqu’un qu’a interagit amb la publicacion.
    Dempuèi la version 0.7.0.0 podètz ! Podètz mencionar qualquun dins un comentari del meteis biais quo fasètz dins una publicacion, nutilizar “@” e començatz a picar lor nom. Notatz que per las publicacions pas publicas, podètz pas que mencionar qualquun qua interagit amb la publicacion.
    modifié par Quentin .
    Copier dans le presse-papier
  9. Since version 0.7.0.0, yes! You can mention someone in a comment the same way you would do it in a post, by typing “@” and then start typing their name. Please note that when you comment on a post which is not public, you can only mention users who have already interacted with the post.
    Since version 0.7.0.0, yes! You can mention someone in a comment the same way you would do it in a post, by typing “@” and then start typing their name. Please note that when you comment on a post which is not public, you can only mention users who have already interacted with the post.

    Since version 0.7.0.0, yes! You can mention someone in a comment the same way you would do it in a post, by typing “@” and then start typing their name. Please note that when you comment on a post which is not public, you can only mention users who have already interacted with the post.

    modifié par Dennis Schubert via une opération en batch.
    Copier dans le presse-papier