Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to 'listen in'.
Diaspora/Website
-
Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to “listen in.”
Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to “listen in.”
De fleste sociale netværk køres på centrale servere, som typisk eges af private virksomheder. Disse virksomheder opbevarer samtlige brugerdata. Disse informationer kan gå tabt, eller kan blive kompromitteret af hackere. Som et hvert system med en flaskehals, kan et hvert problem på den centrale server være med til, at hele netværket hænger i bremsen, eller er fuldstændig ude af drift. Det er også nemmere for myndighederne at "lytte med".
Historique
-
Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to 'listen in'.Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to 'listen in'.modifié via l’API .
-
Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to 'listen in'.Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to 'listen in'.
Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to 'listen in'.
modifié par Jonne Haß via une opération en batch.
-
Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to “listen in.”Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to “listen in.”
Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to “listen in.”
modifié via l’API .
-
Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to “listen in.”Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to “listen in.”
Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to “listen in.”
modifié par Jonne Haß via une opération en batch.
-
De fleste sociale netværk køres på centrale servere, som typisk eges af private virksomheder. Disse virksomheder opbevarer samtlige brugerdata. Disse informationer kan gå tabt, eller kan blive kompromitteret af hackere. Som et hvert system med en flaskehals, kan et hvert problem på den centrale server være med til, at hele netværket hænger i bremsen, eller er fuldstændig ude af drift. Det er også nemmere for myndighederne at "lytte med".De fleste sociale netværk køres på centrale servere, som typisk eges af private virksomheder. Disse virksomheder opbevarer samtlige brugerdata. Disse informationer kan gå tabt, eller kan blive kompromitteret af hackere. Som et hvert system med en flaskehals, kan et hvert problem på den centrale server være med til, at hele netværket hænger i bremsen, eller er fuldstændig ude af drift. Det er også nemmere for myndighederne at "lytte med".modifié par O .
-
De fleste sociale netværk køres på centrale servere, som typisk eges af private virksomheder. Disse virksomheder opbevarer samtlige brugerdata. Disse informationer kan gå tabt, eller kan blive kompromitteret af hackere. Som et hvert system med en flaskehals, kan et hvert problem på den centrale server være med til, at hele netværket hænger i bremsen, eller er fuldstændig ude af drift. Det er også nemmere for myndighederne at "lytte med".De fleste sociale netværk køres på centrale servere, som typisk eges af private virksomheder. Disse virksomheder opbevarer samtlige brugerdata. Disse informationer kan gå tabt, eller kan blive kompromitteret af hackere. Som et hvert system med en flaskehals, kan et hvert problem på den centrale server være med til, at hele netværket hænger i bremsen, eller er fuldstændig ude af drift. Det er også nemmere for myndighederne at "lytte med".modifié par Flemming .
© 2009-2024 WebTranslateIt Software S.L. Tous droits réservés.
Termes d’utilisation
·
Politique de confidentialité
·
Politique de sécurité