Diaspora/Website

• pages.about.asp2_ex
  For example, you might have aspects for your family, for your closest friends, for work colleagues and for a sport or hobby you’re involved in. Your work colleagues don’t need to know about your family reunion, do they? With aspects, they won’t.

Historique

1. For example, you might have aspects for your family, for your closest friends, for work colleagues and for a sport or hobby you're involved in. Your work colleagues don't need to know about your family reunion, do they? With aspects, they won't.

   For example, you might have aspects for your family, for your closest friends, for work colleagues and for a sport or hobby you're involved in. Your work colleagues don't need to know about your family reunion, do they? With aspects, they won't.

   For example, you might have aspects for your family, for your closest friends, for work colleagues and for a sport or hobby you're involved in. Your work colleagues don't need to know about your family reunion, do they? With aspects, they won't.

   Pas de version précédente avec laquelle comparer.
   modifié via l’API jeudi 15 août 2013 13:45:26 UTC.

   
2. For example, you might have aspects for your family, for your closest friends, for work colleagues and for a sport or hobby you're involved in. Your work colleagues don't need to know about your family reunion, do they? With aspects, they won't.

   For example, you might have aspects for your family, for your closest friends, for work colleagues and for a sport or hobby you're involved in. Your work colleagues don't need to know about your family reunion, do they? With aspects, they won't.

   For example, you might have aspects for your family, for your closest friends, for work colleagues and for a sport or hobby you're involved in. Your work colleagues don't need to know about your family reunion, do they? With aspects, they won't.
   modifié par Jonne Haß vendredi 16 août 2013 20:47:26 UTC via une opération en batch.

   
3. For example, you might have aspects for your family, for your closest friends, for work colleagues and for a sport or hobby you’re involved in. Your work colleagues don’t need to know about your family reunion, do they? With aspects, they won’t.

   For example, you might have aspects for your family, for your closest friends, for work colleagues and for a sport or hobby you’re involved in. Your work colleagues don’t need to know about your family reunion, do they? With aspects, they won’t.

   For example, you might have aspects for your family, for your closest friends, for work colleagues and for a sport or hobby you’re involved in. Your work colleagues don’t need to know about your family reunion, do they? With aspects, they won’t.

   • For example, you might have aspects for your family, for your closest friends, for work colleagues and for a sport or hobby you're involved in. Your work colleagues don't need to know about your family reunion, do they? With aspects, they won't.
   • For example, you might have aspects for your family, for your closest friends, for work colleagues and for a sport or hobby you’re involved in. Your work colleagues don’t need to know about your family reunion, do they? With aspects, they won’t.
   modifié via l’API samedi 24 août 2013 12:16:36 UTC.

   
4. For example, you might have aspects for your family, for your closest friends, for work colleagues and for a sport or hobby you’re involved in. Your work colleagues don’t need to know about your family reunion, do they? With aspects, they won’t.

   For example, you might have aspects for your family, for your closest friends, for work colleagues and for a sport or hobby you’re involved in. Your work colleagues don’t need to know about your family reunion, do they? With aspects, they won’t.

   For example, you might have aspects for your family, for your closest friends, for work colleagues and for a sport or hobby you’re involved in. Your work colleagues don’t need to know about your family reunion, do they? With aspects, they won’t.
   modifié par Jonne Haß samedi 24 août 2013 12:25:37 UTC via une opération en batch.