Diaspora/Website

 Raccourcis clavier disponibles

Souhaitez-vous aider à traduire Website dans votre langue? Joignez-vous à l’équipe de et participez à la traduction!

pages.about.notthis_ex

Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to “listen in.”
Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to “listen in.”

Sa majoria de sas retzas sotziales funtzionant cun servers de propriedade de una corporatzione, e manigiados dae issos. Custos servers sarvant totu sos datos privados de sos impreadores. Custas informatziones podent èssere pèrdidas o furadas, e comente in totu sos sistemas cun unu tzugu de ampulla unuproblema in sos servers tzentrales diat pòdere rallentare totu sa retza, o la diat pòdere fintzas firmare de su totu. E est fintzas meda prus fàtzile "ascurtare" pro sos governos.

Historique

Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to 'listen in'.
Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to 'listen in'.
Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to 'listen in'.

Pas de version précédente avec laquelle comparer.

modifié via l’API jeudi 15 août 2013 13:45:21 UTC.
Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to 'listen in'.
Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to 'listen in'.
Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to 'listen in'.

modifié par Jonne Haß vendredi 16 août 2013 20:47:29 UTC via une opération en batch.
Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to “listen in.”
Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to “listen in.”
Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to “listen in.”
- Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to 'listen in'.
- Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to “listen in.”
modifié via l’API samedi 24 août 2013 12:16:30 UTC.
Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to “listen in.”
Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to “listen in.”
Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to “listen in.”

modifié par Jonne Haß samedi 24 août 2013 12:25:38 UTC via une opération en batch.
Sa majoria de sas retzas sotziales funtzionant cun servers de propriedade de una corporatzione, e manigiados dae issos. Custos servers sarvant totu sos datos privados de sos impreadores. Custas informatziones podent èssere pèrdidas o furadas, e comente in totu sos sistemas cun unu tzugu de ampulla unuproblema in sos servers tzentrales diat pòdere rallentare totu sa retza, o la diat pòdere fintzas firmare de su totu. E est fintzas meda prus fàtzile "ascurtare" pro sos governos.
Sa majoria de sas retzas sotziales funtzionant cun servers de propriedade de una corporatzione, e manigiados dae issos. Custos servers sarvant totu sos datos privados de sos impreadores. Custas informatziones podent èssere pèrdidas o furadas, e comente in totu sos sistemas cun unu tzugu de ampulla unuproblema in sos servers tzentrales diat pòdere rallentare totu sa retza, o la diat pòdere fintzas firmare de su totu. E est fintzas meda prus fàtzile "ascurtare" pro sos governos.

Pas de version précédente avec laquelle comparer.

modifié par Bainzu jeudi 23 novembre 2017 22:58:43 UTC.